Autorentext

Thomas A. Howe is professor of Bible and biblical languages at Southern Evangelical Seminary. His focus of study and his continuing interest is in hermeneutics and philosophy of religion. He is the author of Objectivity in Biblical Interpretation (2005), which is a popular-level presentation of his dissertation. Thomas is a contributing coauthor to the Festschrift in honor of Norman L. Geisler. Howe has written "Faith and Reason" in the volume To Everyone an Answer: A Case for the Christian Worldview, edited by Francis J. Beckwith, William Lane Craig, and J. P. Moreland (2004); and he is coauthor with Norman L. Geisler of When Critics Ask (1992). Thomas Howe and his wife, Pat, have three children and six grandchildren.

Klappentext

The study of the End Times has been a popular topic for many years, and there are many different positions that are proposed on how to understand the unfolding of God's program. The debate over the End Times has often been heated and has failed to showcase the best that Christian scholarship has to offer. It sometimes seems like everyone wants to get in on the action, and anyone who has an audience can (and has) put together his thoughts and made his opinions known through the printed page. Anyone can publish his views regardless of the level of competency in the original languages, his level of hermeneutic ability, or his understanding of history or theology. In his book The Apocalypse Code, Hank Hanegraaff declares that his goal is to ""put hermeneutical tools into your hands so that you can draw from Scripture what God intends you to understand rather than uncritically accepting end-time models that may well be foreign to the text."" It would be extremely helpful for someone to equip readers to be able to make their way through the maze of views. What the Bible Really Says? is a point-by-point analysis of the arguments of Hank Hanegraaff concerning end-times prophecy. This book is not an effort to promote one eschatological perspective over another. Rather it is an analysis of Hanegraaff's arguments and claims in order to discover whether or not he has succeeded in putting hermeneutical tools into the hands of his readers, or whether he has simply added his voice and his opinions to the cacophony of claims and counterclaims.