This book specifically covers issues regarding jurisdiction and the recognition andenforcement of judgments in cross-border mass disputes relating to financial services.Collective redress mechanisms, legal mechanisms which can be used to resolve mass disputescollectively, are growing more important. Due to the global increase in cross-bordertrade and financial transactions, the number of cross-border mass disputes has increased.In the EU, several prototypes of collective redress mechanism exist that can be used toresolve mass disputes and, aside from the EU's recommendation on the drafting oflaws relating to collective redress, a reevaluation of the Brussels Regulation has alsotaken place as on 10 January 2015 the Brussels I-bis Regulation replaced the old BrusselsRegulation dating from 2000.
In spite of a minor reference to collective redress in the Commission proposal, BrusselsI-bis does not contain any provision relating to collective redress. As a result, many questionsregarding cross-border mass disputes and the relevant private international law issues remainunanswered and unresolved. This book sets out to describe the most important prototypesby referring to actual collective redress mechanisms.
In addition, it also sets out how parties to such mass disputes can confer jurisdiction to courtsin the EU and what the various pitfalls are. Moreover, the rules concerning the recognitionand enforcement of judgments originating from a collective procedure are listed. Ascross-border collective redress mechanisms and the rules of private international law to beused in such a context are still being developed, the goals of private international law andthe goals of the referred collective redress mechanisms are analysed to provide an insightinto how these sets of rules should and could be employed.
This book is primarily aimed at researchers, practitioners and lawmakers actively involvedin and/or professionally interested in the field of private international law and collectiveredress mechanisms and should prove very useful in providing them with a greater in-depthunderstanding of the issues at hand.
Thijs Bosters is a law clerk at the Dutch Supreme Court. Prior to his work at the SupremeCourt, he was an attorney-at-law with NautaDutilh in The Netherlands, where he workedin the Litigation & Arbitration department.

Gives an extensive overview of private international law and class action-style proceedings in the EU Sets out the aims of the Brussels Regulation and the aims of various collective redress mechanisms to demonstrate in an often practical manner how these sets of rules should and/or could be employed Provides ideas for legislators regarding new rules by which to regulate the field of cross-border mass disputes Includes supplementary material: sn.pub/extras

Inhalt
Introduction.- Collective redress mechanisms in the EU.- German KapMuG procedure.- Dutch collective action.- Dutch WCAM procedure.- Jurisdiction in cross-border mass disputes 76.- Jurisdiction and the KapMuG.- Jurisdiction and the Dutch collective action 127.- Jurisdiction and the WCAM.- Parallel proceedings.- Goals of the Brussels Regulation regarding jurisdiction.- Recognition and enforcement of foreign collective redress judgments.- Recognition and enforcement of KapMuG judgments.- Recognition and enforcement in relation to a collective action procedure.- Recognition and enforcement of a WCAM judgment.- Goals of the Brussels Regulation regarding recognition and enforcement.- Making cross-border collective redress possible.- Summary.- Relevant developments and possible future research.- Bibliography.- Curriculum vitae.- Index7632.