Pre-modern and early modern conceptions of Scientia differ systematically from one another. This book offers a variety of glimpses of this difference by exploring the works of individual philosophers as well as philosophical movements and groupings.

Scientia is the term that early modern philosophers applied to a certain kind of demonstrative knowledge, the kind whose starting points were appropriate first principles. In pre-modern philosophy, too, scientia was the name for demonstrative knowledge from first principles. But pre-modern and early modern conceptions differ systematically from one another. This book offers a variety of glimpses of this difference by exploring the works of individual philosophers as well as philosophical movements and groupings of the period. Some of the figures are transitional, falling neatly on neither side of the allegiances usually marked by the scholastic/modern distinction. Among the philosophers whose views on scientia are surveyed are Hobbes, Descartes, Spinoza, Gassendi, Locke, and Jungius. The contributors are among the best-known and most influential historians of early modern philosophy.

Accessible study of the early modern philosophers dispute on Scientia Philosophers surveyed : Spinoza, Hobbes, Descartes, Gassendi, Locke and Jungius Through top contributors a must-read for everybody interested in early modern knowledge theory

Inhalt
Philosophia, Historia, Mathematica: Shifting Sands in the Disciplinary Geography of the Seventeenth Century.- The Unity of Natural Philosophy and the End of Scientia.- Matter, Mortality, and the Changing Ideal of Science.- Scientia and Inductio Scientifica in the Logica Hamburgensis of Joachim Jungius.- Scientia and the Sciences in Descartes.- Scientia and Self-knowledge in Descartes.- Spinoza's Theory of Scientia Intuitiva.- Scientia in Hobbes.- John Locke and the Limits of Scientia.