This book examines how the fall of France in the Second World War has been recorded by historians and remembered within society. It argues that explanations of the fall have usually revolved around the four main themes of decadence, failure, constraint and contingency. It shows that the dominant explanation claimed for many years that the fall was the inevitable consequence of a society grown rotten in the inter-war period. This view has been largely replaced among academic historians by a consensus which distinguishes between the military defeat and the political demise of the Third Republic. It emphasizes the contingent factors that led to the military defeat. At the same time it seeks to understand the constraints within which France's policy-makers were required to act and the reasons for their policy-making failures in economics, defence and diplomacy.

Examines how the fall of France in the Second World War has been explained and remembered by historians and society more widely Argues that most explanations of the fall of France focus on four main themes decadence, failure, constraint and contingency Explores the context and constraints which influenced the decisions made by French policy-makers and the effect this had on the nation

Autorentext

Richard Carswell is an independent researcher specialising in French and British history of the mid-twentieth century. His doctoral thesis, from the University of Reading, analysed the image of France in the British press in the period 1938-1940.

Inhalt

Chapter One: Introduction.- Chapter Two: Premonitions and Predictions.- Chapter Three: War and Waiting.- Chapter Four: Trauma and Treason.- Chapter Five: Divine Punishment and Decadence.- Chapter Six: Failures and Constraints.- Chapter Seven: Contingencies and Consequences.- Chapter Eight: Memory and Memorialisation.- Chapter Nine: Conclusions.