This book provides explanations of institutional factors that contribute to the fact that sociology is haunted by theoretical dichotomies. Drawing on Foucault, Latour, Collins and others, the author presents possible ways that could lead sociology out of the theoretical field. These ways are dominated by the anthropological paradox.

This book seeks to analyse the categorial structure of sociological theory. The analysis is based on three assumptions: first, sociological theory is in a state of structural crisis; second, one of the symptoms of the crisis is the existence of many theoretical dichotomies which hinder the unification of sociological knowledge; and third, sociology of knowledge may analyse the causes of sociological theory's structural crisis. Drawing on Foucault's work, the author defines the source of theoretical crisis as an anthropological paradox: the involvement of man in a dialectic of being created and defined by what is objective while, at the same time, transcending this condition into the subjective. This study argues that insights found in works by Luhmann, Latour, Collins, Shapin, and others provide a chance for a formulation of a theoretical language for sociology that escapes the anthropological paradox.

Autorentext

Rados aw Sojak is Associate Professor at the Institute of Sociology at Nicolaus Copernicus University (NCU) in Torü, Poland. His research interests include social theory, sociology of science and knowledge, post-communist transformation (the role of violence and behind-the-scenes aspects of social processes) and public discourse analysis.

Inhalt

Sociology - Social theory - Sociological theory - Sociology of knowledge - Sociology of science - Science and technology studies - Philosophy of science - Mary Douglas - Stephan Fuchs - Michel Foucault - Bruno Latour - Harry M. Collins