Why did Peter cease eating with Gentile Christians at Antioch (Gal 2:11-14)? Through a character study of Peter in the Gospels and Acts, and an analysis of the Jewish response to Roman rule in the first century AD, Jack Gibson seeks an answer to this question.

Why did Peter cease eating with the Gentile Christians at Antioch (Gal 2:11-14) after defending his decision to eat with Cornelius before the entire Jerusalem church (Acts 11:1-18)? Beginning with a character study of Peter throughout the Gospels and Acts, Jack Gibson demonstrates that Peter is consistently portrayed as being a faithful disciple whose pre-Pentecost impetuosity is due to a lack of understanding of the message of Jesus and his post-Pentecost boldness is due to his newly-revealed understanding of this message. The historical background to the Antioch incident is considered, with special consideration given to the Jewish response to Roman rule, a response which was characterized by passive resistance through the period of the Roman prefects and Herod Agrippa (AD 6-44) and an increasing acceptance of active resistance by the general populace after Agrippa's death. Peter's relationship with James and Paul is analyzed, culminating in an evaluation of Peter's motivations for ceasing to eat with the Gentiles.

Autorentext
Born 1973; 1995 BA; 2006 MA; 2011 PhD; currently High School Bible Teacher, Grace Brethren High School, Simi Valley, CA, Adjunct Professor of Bible, Lancaster Bible College, Lancaster, PA, and Adjunct Assistant Professor of Biblical Studies, Hope International University, Fullerton, CA.