How was Acts of Paul formed, and why? With comparison to the canonized Acts, Glenn E. Snyder provides a critical examination of Greek, Latin, and Coptic witnesses to Acts of Paul from the second to sixth centuries, with chapters on the independently circulating acts, extant collections, and other evidence for the composition and reception of Acts of Paul .

Acts of Paul is a collection of early Christian traditions that were not included in the canonized Acts: the Acts of Paul and Thekla , 3 Corinthians , the Martyrdom of Paul , and other fabulous stories, such as Paul baptizing a lion. By the end of the second century, there was a rumor in North Africa that "Acts of Paul" had been fabricated by a presbyter in Asia Minor (Tertullian, De baptismo 17.5); and to this day, it is alleged that Acts of Paul is later than and inferior to the traditions preserved in Acts - historically, theologically, and otherwise. But what evidence is there for the composition and reception of Acts of Paul ? In this study Glenn E. Snyder critically examines Greek, Latin, and Coptic witnesses to Acts of Paul from the second to sixth centuries, with chapters on the independently circulating acts, extant collections, and other evidence for the formation of Acts of Paul.

Autorentext
Born 1976; 1998 BA Indiana University (Bloomington); 2002 MAR Yale University; 2005 AM and 2010 PhD Harvard University; in 2013-14, Visiting Lecturer in Religious Studies at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.