Legal argumentation is a distinctively multidisciplinary field of inquiry. It draws its data, assumptions and methods from disciplines such as legal theory, legal philosophy, logic, argumentation theory, rhetoric, linguistics, literary theory, philosophy, sociology, and artificial intelligence. This presents the growing group of interested scholars and students with a problem of access, since, even for those active in the field, it is not common to have acquired a familiarity with relevant aspects of each discipline that enters into this multidisciplinary matrix. Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation offers its readers a unique and comprehensive survey of the various theoretical influences which have informed the study of legal argumentation. It discusses salient backgrounds to this field as well as all major approaches and trends in the contemporary research. It surveys relevant theoretical factors both from various continental law traditions and common law countries.

Autorentext

Eveline T. Feteris is an Associate Professor at the Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric of the University of Amsterdam. She is a member of the research programme of the Argumentation & Rhetoric Group Amsterdam (ARGA) and the research school of the International Learned Institute of Argumentation Studies (ILIAS). She is director of the research masters's programme Text and Communication. Her research interests are argumentation theory, legal argumentation theory, and visual argumentation. Feteris is author of several books, academic volumes and many publications in international journals. Among Feteris' key publications are Fundamental of Legal Argumentation: A Survey of Theories of Justification of Judicial Decisions, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands 1999 (translated in Chinese, Spanish and Turkish); E.T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H.J. Plug, Argumentation and the Application of Legal Rules, Amsterdam: Sic Sat, 2009; E.T. Feteris, B.J. Garssen, A.F. Snoeck Henkemans, Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2011; C. Dahlman and E.T. Feteris, Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-disciplinary Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013; E.T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H.J. Plug, C.E. Smith, Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law, The Hague: Eleven, 2016.

Inhalt
One Research into Legal Argumentation.- Two A Survey of Approaches and Topics.- Three The Logical Approach.- Four Toulmin's Argumentation Model.- Five Perelman's New Rhetoric.- Six Habermas' Theory of Communicative Rationality.- Seven Maccormick's Theory of the Justification of Legal Decisions.- Eight Alexy's Procedural Theory of Legal Argumentation.- Nine Aarnio's Theory of the Justification of Legal Interpretations.- Ten Peczenik's Theory of Transformations in the Law.- Eleven The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Legal Argumentation in the Context of a Critical Discussion.- Twelve Towards A Theory of Legal Argumentation in the Context of a Critical Discussion.- Author Index.