Herman Cappelen investigates how language and other representational devices can go wrong, and how to fix them. We use language to understand and talk about the world, but what if our language has deficiencies that prevent it from playing that role? How can we revise our concepts, and what are the limits on revision?

Herman Cappelen investigates ways in which language (and other representational devices) can be defective, and how they can be improved. In all parts of philosophy there are philosophers who criticize the concepts we have and propose ways to improve them. Once one notices this about philosophy, it's easy to see that revisionist projects occur in a range of other intellectual disciplines and in ordinary life. That fact gives rise to a cluster of questions: How does
the process of conceptual amelioration work? What are the limits of revision? (How much revision is too much?) How does the process of revision fit into an overall theory of language and communication? Fixing Language aims to answer those questions. In so doing, it aims also to draw attention to a
tradition in 20th- and 21st-century philosophy that isn't sufficiently recognized. There's a straight intellectual line from Frege and Carnap to a cluster of contemporary work that isn't typically seen as closely related: much work on gender and race, revisionism about truth, revisionism about moral language, and revisionism in metaphysics and philosophy of mind. These views all have common core commitments: revision is both possible and important. They also face common challenges about the
methods, assumptions, and limits of revision.

This is a must-read book for scholars interested in gender, armed forces, and militarism.

Autorentext
Herman Cappelen is a professor of philosophy at the University of Oslo and at the University of St Andrews. He is one of the co-directors of ConceptLab. He has written and co-authored several books and works in all areas of philosophy.

Inhalt

• I. Introduction to Conceptual Engineering

• 1: Introduction

• 2: Illustrations: Conceptual Engineering in Philosophy and Beyond

• 3: Arguments for the Importance of Conceptual Engineering and Implications for Philosophical Methodology

• 4: On the Importance of a General Theory and an Overview of the Austerity Framework

• II. Towards a General Theory, 1: Metasemantic Foundations

• 5: Metasemantics, Metasemantic Superstructure and Metasemantic base

• 6: Externalist Conceptual Engineering

• 7: Corollaries of Externalism: Inscrutability, Lack of Control, and Anti-Luminosity

• 8: The Illusion of Incoherent / Inconsistent Concepts

• III. Towards a General Theory, 2: Topic Continuity as the Limits for Revision

• 9: The Limits of Revision and Topics (Dis)Continuity and Miscommunication

• 10: Reply to Strawson 1: Continuity of Topic, Samesaying and the Contestation Theory

• 11: Reply to Strawson 2: Lexical Effects

• IV. Towards a General Theory, 3: Worldliness and the Varieties of Conceptual Engineering

• 12: The Worldliness of Conceptual Engineering

• 13: Varieties of Conceptual Engineering

• 14: Objections and Replies

• V. Compare and Contrast: Alternative Accounts of Conceptual Engineering

• 15: Metalinguistic Negotiation

• 16: On Appeals to Function

• 17: Chalmers on the Subscript Gambit

• 18: Conceptual Engineering Without Bedrock and Without Fixed Points

• 19: Concluding Remarks: Looking Ahead