Spheres of Injustice

How minority issues concern all of us, and why a new conception of justice grounded in solidarity can revitalize democracy. How can the rights of minorities be best protected in democracies? The question has been front and center in the US since the Supreme Court’s repeal of affirmative action. In Europe too, minority politics are being challenged. Reactionary groups abuse the notion of minority by demanding to be protected just as minorities are. Also, the notion of a “protected class” risks encouraging competition among minorities. In the age of algorithms, the very concept of minority is finally being transformed--the law of averages is replacing that of the greater number. In Perreau proposes thinking about minority experiences relationally. How one person is governed has a direct impact on how another is. Legal provisions that protect gender can be used to protect race; those that protect disability can protect age, sexual orientation, or class, and so on. This is what Perreau calls Updating one of the greatest classics of political theory, <Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality< by Michael Walzer, Perreau shows that minority presence can teach new forms of responsibility to one another and that the resonances between experiences of injustice--much more than a belief in shared moral principles--ground a political community.

Autorentext
Bruno Perreau is Cynthia L. Reed Professor of French Studies at MIT and a Faculty Affiliate at the Center for European Studies, Harvard University. He is the author of a dozen books including The Politics of Adoption and Queer Theory: The French Response.