This book revisits psychology's appropriation of natural scientific methods. The author argues that, in order to overcome ongoing methodological debates in psychology, it is necessary to confront the problem of formalisation contained in the appropriation of methods of natural science.

This book revisits psychology's appropriation of natural scientific methods. The author argues that, in order to overcome ongoing methodological debates in psychology, it is necessary to confront the problem of formalisation contained in the appropriation of methods of natural science. By doing so, the subject matter of psychology the human being and questions about the meaning of human existence can be brought to the centre of the discipline. Drawing on Garfinkel, Sacks, Edwards and Potter, the author sees ethnomethodologically informed qualitative methods, which stem from phenomenology, as a possible alternative to statistical methods, but ultimately finds these methods to be just another method of formalisation.She returns to Husserlian phenomenology as a way to critique the centrality of method in psychology and shows that the adoption of natural scientific methods in psychology is part of the larger push to formalise and objectify all aspects of human existence.

Autorentext

Anita Williams is an Adjunct Philosophy Lecturer at the Murdoch University, Perth (Australia). She questions the increasing psychologisation of thinking and experience; drawing on Patöka, Husserl and Heidegger.

Klappentext

This book revisits psychology s appropriation of natural scientific methods. The author argues that, in order to overcome ongoing methodological debates in psychology, it is necessary to confront the problem of formalisation contained in the appropriation of methods of natural science. By doing so, the subject matter of psychology the human being and questions about the meaning of human existence can be brought to the centre of the discipline. Drawing on Garfinkel, Sacks, Edwards and Potter, the author sees ethnomethodologically informed qualitative methods, which stem from phenomenology, as a possible alternative to statistical methods, but ultimately finds these methods to be just another method of formalisation.She returns to Husserlian phenomenology as a way to critique the centrality of method in psychology and shows that the adoption of natural scientific methods in psychology is part of the larger push to formalise and objectify all aspects of human existence.

Inhalt

Psychology, Ethnomethodology and Phenomenology - Part 1: Phenomenology as a guideline for an empirical method - A Conversation Analytic Investigation of Therapy: Clinical Psychologists Use Members Methods to Present Their Interpretation as Objective - An Ethnomethodological Investigation of Therapy: Clinical Psychologists «Do Being Ordinary» - (3) A Discursive Psychological Investigation of Therapy: «Personality» as a Mediating Device - Part 2: A phenomenological critique of quantitative and ethnomethodologically-informed qualitative methods in psychology - (4) The Theoretical Attitude and the Natural Scientific Attitude - (5) Method as Formalisation: Empirical Data as Formal Categories - Psychology and Formalisation