CHF73.00
Download steht sofort bereit
Selection bias can, and does, occur, even in randomized clinical
trials. Steps need to be taken in order to ensure that this does
not compromise the integrity of clinical trials; hence
"Selection Bias and Covariate Imbalances in Randomized
Clinical Trials" offers a comprehensive treatment of the
subject and the methodology involved. This book:
Provides an overview of the hierarchy of study designs, and
justifies the position of randomised trials at the top of this
hierarchy.
Discusses the strengths and defects of randomisation, and
provides real evidence to justify concern regarding its
defects.
Outlays the damaging consequences that selection bias causes
when it does occur.
Considers courses of action that can be taken to manage/
contain the problem.
Presents methods that can be used to detect selection bias in
randomised trials, and methods to correct for selection bias.
Concludes by providing a comprehensive plan for managing
baseline imbalances and selection bias in randomised trials, and
proposing open problems for future research.
Illustrated with case studies, this book introduces
groundbreaking ideas and research that will be invaluable to
researchers and practitioners who design and analyse clinical
trials. It will also be of interest to graduate students within the
field of biostatistics.
Autorentext
Vance Berger is the author of Selection Bias and Covariate Imbalances in Randomized Clinical Trials, published by Wiley.
Klappentext
Baseline data in clinical trials consists of information regarding patients that is measured at the outset, prior to randomization (or treatment with study medications). In studies where important baseline factors appear well balanced, it can be reasonably concluded that any differences in outcome between the intervention and control groups are a real effect of treatment. The common assumption that any baseline differences in a randomized study are necessarily random is, however, misplaced. Selection bias can, and does, occur even in randomized clinical trials. Steps need to be taken in order to ensure that this does not compromise the integrity of clinical trials; hence Selection Bias and Covariate Imbalances in Randomized Clinical Trials offers the first comprehensive treatment of the subject and the methodology involved.
Zusammenfassung
Selection bias can, and does, occur, even in randomized clinical trials. Steps need to be taken in order to ensure that this does not compromise the integrity of clinical trials; hence Selection Bias and Covariate Imbalances in Randomized Clinical Trials offers a comprehensive treatment of the subject and the methodology involved. This book:
Inhalt
Preface.
Part I: Is There a Problem with Reliability in Medical Studies?
1 An Evolution of Comparative Methodology.
1.1 Single-subject studies.
1.2 Case series and cohort studies.
1.3 Historical controls.
1.4 Parallel control groups.
1.5 Matched studies.
1.6 Randomization.
1.7 Advance randomization.
1.8 Allocation concealment.
1.9 Residual selection bias.
2 Susceptibility of Randomized Trials to Subversion and Selection Bias.
2.1 Can randomized trials be subverted?
2.2 If randomized trials are subverted, do they cease to be randomized trials?
2.3 What is masking?
2.4 What is allocation concealment?
2.5 A double standard.
2.6 What if allocation concealment could be ensured?
3 Evidence of Selection Bias in Randomized Trials.
3.1 The burden of proof regarding the existence of selection bias in randomized trials.
3.2 Indirect population-level evidence that selection bias exists in randomized trials.
3.3 Direct trial-level evidence that selection bias exists in randomized trials.
3.3.1 Heparin for myocardial infarction.
3.3.2 University Group Diabetes Program.
3.3.3 Talc and mustine for pleural effusions.
3.3.4 Tonsillectomy for recurrent throat infection in children.
3.3.5 Oxytocin and amniotomy for induction of labor.
3.3.6 Western Washington Intracoronary Streptokinase Trial.
3.3.7 RSV immune globulin in infants and young children with respiratory syncytial virus.
3.3.8 A trial to assess episiotomy.
3.3.9 Canadian National Breast Cancer Screening Study.
3.3.10 Surgical trial.
3.3.11 Lifestyle Heart Trial.
3.3.12 Coronary Artery Surgery Study.
3.3.13 Etanercept for children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.
3.3.14 Edinburgh Randomized Trial of Breast-Cancer Screening.
3.3.15 Captopril Prevention Project.
3.3.16 G¨oteborg (Swedish) Mammography Trial.
3.3.17 HIP Mammography Trial.
3.3.18 Hypertension Detection and Follow-Up Program.
3.3.19 Randomized trial to prevent vertical transmission of HIV-1.
3.3.20 Effectiveness trial of a diagnostic test.
3.3.21 South African trial of high-dose chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.
3.3.22 Randomized study of a culturally sensitive AIDS education program.
3.3.23 Runaway Youth Study.
3.3.24 Cluster randomized trial of palliative care.
3.3.25 Randomized trial of methadone with or without heroin.
3.3.26 Randomized NINDS trial of tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke.
3.3.27 Norwegian Timolol Trial.
3.3.28 Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.
3.3.29 The Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) Study.
3.3.30 The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) Study.
3.4 In search of better evidence.
4 Impact of Selection Bias in Randomized Trials.
4.1 Quantifying the prediction of future allocations: balanced b…