Competency to be Tried, Imprisoned, and Executed

First Published in 2002. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.

Auteur

Jane Moriarty is Visiting Associate Professor at the University of Akron School of Law, Akron Ohio. She is author of Psychological and Scientific Evidence in Criminal Trials (Clark Boardman Callaghan, 1996), which is updated annually, and editor of Women and the Law (West Group, 1998). She has written a number of articles dealing with law, evidence, and expert witnesses.

Texte du rabat

First Published in 2002. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.

Résumé
First Published in 2002. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.

Contenu

Dusky v. United States , 362 U.S. 402 (1960). Pate v. Robinson , 383 U.S. 375 (1966). Drope v. Missouri , 420 U.S. 162 (1975). Ford v. Wainwright , 477 U.S. 399 (1986). Penry v. Lynaugh , 492 U.S. 302 (1989). Washington v. Harper , 494 U.S. 210 (1990). Riggins v. Nevada , 504 U.S. 127 (1992). Louisiana v. Perry , 610 So.2d 746 (1992). Foucha v. Louisiana , 504 U.S. 71 (1992). Cooper v. Oklahoma , 517 U.S. 348 (1996). Arrigo, Bruce A. and Christopher R. Williams. Law, Ideology, and Critical Inquiry: The Case of Treatment Refusal for Incompetent Prisoners Awaiting Execution, New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement 25 (1999).