New Perspectives on Chinese Syntax

Mandarin Chinese has become indispensable for crosslinguistic comparison and syntactic theorizing. It is nevertheless still difficult to obtain comprehensive answers to research questions, because Chinese is often presented as an "exotic" language defying the analytical tools standardly used for other languages. This book sets out to demystify Chinese. It places controversial issues in the context of current syntactic theories and offers precise analyses based on a large array of representative data. Although the focus is on Modern Mandarin, earlier stages of Chinese are occasionally referred to in order to highlight striking continuities in its history. VO order is one such constant factor, thus invalidating the idea that Chinese went through a major word order change from OV to VO and back to OV. Another claim often made for Chinese as an isolating language, viz. the existence of an impoverished inventory of parts of speech, is likewise refuted. Other long debated issues addressed here include the relevance of the dichotomy topic vs subject prominence and the role of Chinese as a recurring exception to crosscategorial harmonies posited in typological studies.

Auteur

Waltraud Paul, Centre de recherches linguistiques sur l Asie orientale (CRLAO), CNRS, Paris, Frankreich.

Texte du rabat

In the last thirty years, Mandarin Chinese has been playing an increasingly important role in general linguistics and has become a must for everyone interested in crosslinguistic comparison and syntactic theorizing. The book aims at demystifying Chinese. It places controversial issues within the larger context of current syntactic theories, offers precise analyses and points out the untenability of preconceived ideas in the literature.

Résumé

"[...] this book is of great significance from syntactic, typological and language acquisition angles. t provides a new and creative perspective on the study of syntax and typology, and will surely inspire readers to raise more questions and encourage further discussion and research."
Han Yan in: International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 4:2 (2017), 325-331