This book shows that identity studies in the discipline of International Relations (IR) generally cohere around two discrete understandings of being, substantialism and correlationism, and that their analytical, theoretical, and epistemological orientations are split along those lines. This binary opposition makes it difficult for identity scholarship to meet the internal validity standard of coherence while unnecessarily narrowing the theoretical lenses of constructivism in IR. The author argues that the best way to step outside that binary is to re-ground identity in ontology of immanence. The book shows that immanent ontological thinking enables us to have a pluralist epistemology and methodology for the study of identity, including both positivist and interpretivist orientations, without yielding a logically inconsistent alignment.

Develops a typology of identity research that maps its ontological underpinnings Offers a comprehensive stocktaking of identity-based IR studies Deepens our understanding of identity research in IR

Autorentext
Yong-Soo Eun, Ph.D., is Professor of Political Science and International Studies at Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea and the Editor-in-Chief of the Routledge series, IR Theory and Practice in Asia. Yong-Soo received his Ph.D. from the University of Warwick, UK. He is interested in IR theory, postcolonialism and decolonial thinking, Global IR, identity studies, and an ontology of immanence.

Inhalt

Chapter 1: Introduction: A thorny problem.- Chapter 2: A typology of identity research in IR.- Chapter 3: Re-grounding identity in ontology of immanence.- Chapter 4: Illustrations and implications.