This volume of the Netherlands Yearbook of International Law (NYIL) addresses the question how the assumption that states have a common obligation to achieve a collective public good can be reconciled with the fact that the 195 states of today's world are highly diverse and increasingly unequal in terms of size, population, politics, economy, culture, climate and historical development. The idea of common but differentiated responsibilities is on paper the perfect bridge between the factual inequality and formal equality of states. The acknowledgement that states can have common but still different more or less onerous obligations is predicated on the moral and legal concept of global solidarity. This book encompasses general contributions on the function and the content of the related principles, chapters that describe and evaluate how the principles work in a specific area of international law and chapters that address their efficiency andbroader ramifications, in terms of compliance, free-rider behaviour and shifting balances of power. The originality of the book resides in the integration of conceptual, comparative and practical dimensions of the principles of global solidarity and common but differentiated responsibilities. The book is therefore highly recommended reading for both academics with a theoretical interest and those working within international organisations. The Netherlands Yearbook of International Law was first published in 1970. It offers a forum for the publication of scholarly articles in a varying thematic area of public international law.

Offers a survey of how the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities is considered in international law Provides a comparative perspective on the challenges each discipline within international law faced in the application Contributes to the topical debate on climate change and how that translates to the realm of international law/relations

Klappentext

This volume of the Netherlands Yearbook of International Law (NYIL) addresses the question how the assumption that states have a common obligation to achieve a collective public good can be reconciled with the fact that the 195 states of today s world are highly diverse and increasingly unequal in terms of size, population, politics, economy, culture, climate and historical development. The idea of common but differentiated responsibilities is on paper the perfect bridge between the factual inequality and formal equality of states. The acknowledgement that states can have common but still different more or less onerous obligations is predicated on the moral and legal concept of global solidarity. This book encompasses general contributions on the function and the content of the related principles, chapters that describe and evaluate how the principles work in a specific area of international law and chapters that address their efficiency and broader ramifications, in terms of compliance, free-rider behaviour and shifting balances of power. The originality of the book resides in the integration of conceptual, comparative and practical dimensions of the principles of global solidarity and common but differentiated responsibilities. The book is therefore highly recommended reading for both academics with a theoretical interest and those working within international organisations. The Netherlands Yearbook of International Law was first published in 1970. It offers a forum for the publication of scholarly articles in a varying thematic area of public international law.

Inhalt

Part I. Global Solidarity and Common but Differentiated Responsibilities.- Chapter 1. Global Solidarity and Common but Differentiated Responsibilities.- Chapter 2. Responsibility, Solidarity and their Connections in International Law: Towards a Coherent Framework.- Chapter 3. Bellying up to the Bar Differentiating in the Distribution of Responsibilities: A Philosophical Analysis.- Chapter 4. Solidarity and Differentiation: Moral and Legal Obligations of States in Addressing Global Challenges - The Case of Climate Change.- Chapter 5. Global Solidarity, Differentiated Responsibilities and the Law of the Sea.- Chapter 6. Differentiated Rights and Responsibilities in Activities in the Area From Wealth Redistribution to Marine Environmental Protection.- Chapter 7. Are Trade Measures to Tackle the Climate Crisis the End of Differentiated Responsibilities? The Case of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM).- Chapter 8. Embedding 'Solidarity' in International Water Law: Framing 'Equity' in Transboundary Water Governance.- Chapter 9. Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities as a Guiding Principle in International Health Law in Times of Pandemics.- Chapter 10. The Flexibility Device in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.- Chapter 11. Solidarity as Normative Rationale for Differential Treatment: Common but Differentiated Responsibilities from International Environmental to EU Asylum Law?.- Chapter 12. Reconciling the Irreconcilable: Some Thoughts on Belligerent Equality in Non-International Armed Conflicts.- Part II. Dutch Practice.- Chapter 13. In Sickness and in Health: The Right to Self-determination within the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Impact of the Coronavirus Crisis.- Chapter 14. Cooperation and Coordination in Ocean Governance: An Overview of the BBN Process and the Involvement of The Netherlands.- Chapter 15. Victims of Hawija v. The Netherlands: Proportionality and Precaution underMounting Pressure.- Table of Cases.- Index.

<p