The implementation of referenda in advance to an Olympic bid is common in Western democratic countries. In many cases, they have produced negative results, ending the aspiration of Olympic Games on the spot. Germany is no exception to this case. While recent research has predominantly investigated the possible reasons why past referenda have failed, the aim of this book is to evaluate the necessity of a referendum as a tool in the first place. Since a referendum is no formal requirement by the International Olympic Committee (IOC), its application is examined on an ethico-political level. Therefore, the advantages and disadvantages of a referendum in terms of any future German Olympic bid are analysed and discussed from a political, civil and German Olympic Sports Confederation (DOSB) perspective. Based on the findings, this work rejects the necessity of a referendum before a German Olympic bid, as the alignment of ethico-political considerations analysed does not seem to be sufficiently pronounced in the de jure and de facto implementation of this tool.

Autorentext

Lucia Gosebrink is a graduate of the Erasmus Mundus Joint Master of Arts in Sports Ethics and Integrity. She completed her dissertation at the Department of Sports Economics and Sports Sociology at the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Holger Preuß.

Inhalt
Olympic bids in the past.- An analytical-hermeneutic methodology.- Referenda in political science and sport governance.- Analysis and discussion of the issue.- Limitations of the work.- Final conclusion.- Implications and further outlook.- References.