In undemocratic settings, where modes of political participation and interest mediation are severely limited, protest may become a major form of political action. When and why does popular upsurge occur in such a setting? What form does it take and what do people ask for? When does protest become regime-threatening? And how does the authoritarian government react? This book explains the dynamics we observe during regime change facing high contention, in which much is at stake both for those in power and their challengers. Focussing on the experiences of democratizing countries in Asia, the author shows that even in the chaotic context of regime change there are regularities in when and how people mobilize. The book applies concepts and methods used in social movement research to the study of regime change and is based on a newly collected protest event dataset of 20 years for Indonesia, South Korea, and Thailand.

Applies concepts and methods used in social movement research to the study of regime change Highlights a dimension of regime change that is generally under-researched in the literature Utilizes a dataset on protest events over a period of 20 years in three Asian countries

Autorentext

Linda Maduz is a senior researcher at the Center for Security Studies at ETH Zurich, Switzerland.

Inhalt

1. A fresh look at the interrelationship between protest dynamics and regime change.- 2. Old concepts newly combined and a new dataset.- 3. Contrasting protest dynamics in Indonesia, South Korea, and Thailand (19852005).- 4. Where does the power of the people lie? Organization and forms of protest during regime change.- 5. What are they shouting about? Protest demands during regime change.- 6. Opposition from within? Mobilization and organization of civil and political society during regime change.- 7. Rise of the previously excluded classes? Mobilization and organization of workers, farmers, and students during regime change.- 8. Repression and protest during regime change: democratization as an interactive process between power holders and challengers.- 9. Final discussion and conclusion: dynamic transitions and their implications.