Labor unions in France and the U.S. opposed certain restrictionist immigration policy measures in the late twentieth century, whereas they had pressured for restrictionism in the early twentieth century. Leah Haus asks why unions changed coalitions. Haus argues that one needs to focus on the challenges of internationalization to explain this change. Many union leaders consider economic internationalization and/or the internationalization of human rights as undermining the effectiveness and/or desirability of certain restrictionist measures. At the same time, many union leaders see support for certain non-restrictionist measures as a way to facilitate organizing immigrants, which is an alternative strategy for improving wages and work conditions.

'This work will appeal to specialists on immigration and union history because unions' changing positions are very clearly documented...' - R.M. Whaples, Choice

Autorentext
LEAH HAUS is an Associate Professor of Political Science at Vassar College. Her research interests are in international political economy and European politics. Dr. Haus has received a variety of fellowships, and is the author of Globalizing the Gatt: The Soviet Union's Successor States, Eastern Europe, and the International Trading System.

Inhalt
Introduction Explaining Union Immigration Policy Preferences In Pursuit of Complete Control Pragmatic Adaptation French First Resisting Restrictionists Conclusion