Translation as Scholarship

Vorschautext english

In the first half of the 2d millennium BCE, translation occasionally depicted semantically incongruous correspondences. Such cases reflect ancient scribes substantiating their virtuosity with cuneiform writing by capitalizing on phonologic, graphemic, semantic, and other resemblances in the interlingual space. These scholarscribes employed an essential scribal practice, analogical hermeneutics, an interpretative activity grounded in analogical reasoning and empowered by the potentiality of the cuneiform script. Scribal education systematized such practices, allowing scribes to utilize these habits in copying compositions and creating translations.

In scribal education, analogical hermeneutics is exemplified in the word list "Izi", both in its structure and in its occasional bilingualism. By examining "Izi" as a product of the social field of scribal education, this book argues that scribes used analogical hermeneutics to cultivate their craft and establish themselves as knowledgeable scribes. Within a linguistic epistemology of cuneiform scribal culture, translation is a tool in the hands of a knowledgeable scholar.

Autorentext

C. Jay Crisostomo, University of Michigan, MI, U.S.A.

Klappentext

For ancient cuneiform scribes, translation was a means of demonstrating their aptitude with the main focus of their discipline, the cuneiform writing system, resulting in translation practices that are foreign to typical western concepts of translation. This project explores the social worlds which cultivated translation practices in ancient Babyloniäthe field of scholarship.

Zusammenfassung

"[...] any Assyriologist dealing with issues of scribal education, translation theory, or lexical lists should consult Translation as Scholarship. Scholars dealings with Aramaic-Akkadian bilingual inscriptions, along with trilingual inscriptions, should also consult this volume. It establishes a foundation for OB scribal habitus at Nippur and its subsequent reception over two millennia. Perhaps future scholars will continue in Crisostomo's path, exploring how analogical hermeneutics changed over two millennia of Babylonian and Assyrian scholarship."
William Brown in: The Biblical Review (18.02.2019), https://thebiblicalreview.wordpress.com/2019/02/18/translation-as-scholarship-language-writing-and-bilingual-education-in-ancient-babylonia-by-c-jay-crisostomo/

"This book is an outstanding achievement of creative, well-informed, and deeply reflective scholarship, a truly impressive achievement, as well as very interesting reading." Benjamin R. Foster in: Keilschriftforschung, OLZ 115-1 (2020), 34-36