

Beschreibung
Zusatztext This monograph not only manages to add data to a well-established field of research, but is a major contribution to our understanding of the issues involved in the highly relevant field of EU social policy - one of the largest sources of cases comin...Zusatztext This monograph not only manages to add data to a well-established field of research, but is a major contribution to our understanding of the issues involved in the highly relevant field of EU social policy - one of the largest sources of cases coming before the Court of Justice of the European Union. This will remain a book of great importance, also given how contentious trans-border social policy is likely to remain in the EU. In addition to being supported by anexemplary research design, it offers a theoretical development that will inspire other research. Given the contribution to the development of the theory, this book is a must-read for academics in political science and European studies as well as practitioners involved in EU policymaking. Informationen zum Autor Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen is a professor at the University of Copenhagen, Department of Political Science. Her research focuses on EU welfare policies, investigating in particular the interaction between law and politics in European integration and Europeanisation. Her work has appeared in journals such as Public Administration, American Review of Public Administration, Journal of European Public Policy, Journal of Common MarketStudies, West European Politics and European Union Politics. Klappentext Through a close study of social policy developments from 1957 to 2014, this book examines how judicial-legislative interactions determine the scope and limits of European integration in the daily EU decision making process. Vorwort Winner of the EUSA Best Book Award 2015-2016 Zusammenfassung Through a close study of social policy developments from 1957 to 2014, this book examines how judicial-legislative interactions determine the scope and limits of European integration in the daily EU decision making process. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Introduction; 2 The Court of Justice of the European Union: Master of Integration?; 3 A Social Policy for the European Union; 4 Battles on Working Time: Rejecting Court Influence; 5 Patients' Rights in Cross-Border Healthcare: Modifying Judicial Influence; 6 Regulating the Posting of Workers: Rejecting and Modifying Court Influence; 7 Conclusion; Annex 1 Judicial Influence on Policy Outputs over Time; Annex 2 Major Commission Proposals Social and Healthcare Policies 1957-2014; Annex 3 From Proposal to Final Adopted Act; Annex 4 Adding to Annex IIa Over the Years ...
In her three highly topical, well-sampled and methodologically tailored case studies on (1) working time regulation, (2) patientsâ rights in cross-border healthcare and (3) the posting of workers, Martinsen excels in providing rich and convincing evidence of the Court's varying impact on EU social policy outcomes.
Vorwort
Winner of the EUSA Best Book Award 2015-2016
Autorentext
Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen is a professor at the University of Copenhagen, Department of Political Science. Her research focuses on EU welfare policies, investigating in particular the interaction between law and politics in European integration and Europeanisation. Her work has appeared in journals such as Public Administration, American Review of Public Administration, Journal of European Public Policy, Journal of Common Market Studies, West European Politics and European Union Politics.
Klappentext
Through a close study of social policy developments from 1957 to 2014, this book examines how judicial-legislative interactions determine the scope and limits of European integration in the daily EU decision making process.
Inhalt
1: Introduction
2: The Court of Justice of the European Union: Master of Integration?
3: A Social Policy for the European Union
4: Battles on Working Time: Rejecting Court Influence
5: Patients' Rights in Cross-Border Healthcare: Modifying Judicial Influence
6: Regulating the Posting of Workers: Rejecting and Modifying Court Influence
7: Conclusion
Annex 1: Judicial Influence on Policy Outputs over Time
Annex 2: Major Commission Proposals Social and Healthcare Policies 1957-2014
Annex 3: From Proposal to Final Adopted Act
Annex 4: Adding to Annex IIa Over the Years
