In 1999 we invited a small number of colleagues to take part in a colloquium - voted to the analysis of argumentative discourse from two kinds of perspective: a dialectical and a rhetorical perspective. Our intention was to start a thorough disc- sion on the commonalities and differences between the two approaches. In this way we hoped to promote the development of analytic tools for dealing with argum- tation in which, in some way or other, the merits of both approaches are combined. The colloquium took place at the University of Amsterdam. In 2000 it was followed by a second colloquium at New York University, and in 2001 by a third one at Northwestern University. We are grateful to all three universities for giving us the chance to organize three exciting and fruitful meetings and we thank Eugene Garver, Eveline T. Feteris, M.A. van Rees, Ralph Johnson, A. Francisca Snoeck Hen- mans, Jose Plug, Bart Garssen, and Leah Polcar, who took part in the discussions but are not represented inthis volume, for their critical and useful contributions.

Includes supplementary material: sn.pub/extras

Inhalt

1. And Always the Twain Shall Meet.- 2. Reasonable Argument before Aristotle: The Roots of the Enthymeme.- 3. Meeting in the House of Callias: An Historical Perspective on Rhetoric and Dialectic.- 4. Rhetoric and Dialectic: Some Historical and Legal Perspectives.- 5. The Relation between Dialectic and Rhetoric in a Classical and a Modern Perspective.- 6. Evaluating Argumentative Discourse from a Rhetorical Perspective: Defining 'Person' and 'Human Life' in Constitutional Disputes Over Abortion.- 7. Designing Issues.- 8. Pivotal Issues and Norms in Rhetorical Theories of Argumentation.- 9. Messages, Functional Contexts, and Categories of Fallacy: Some Dialectical and Rhetorical Considerations.- 10. Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance.- The contributors.- Index of names.