Informationen zum Autor Debbie Becher is Assistant Professor of Sociology at Barnard College, Columbia University. Klappentext This book examines how citizens judge whether government is abusing its power when making use of eminent domain. Debbie Becher argues that neither a belief in property rights nor a desire for growth guide popular evaluations of government legitimacy. Instead, community residents, businesses, government bureaucrats, and politicians all appeal to a shared notion of investment to justify policy. Zusammenfassung This book examines how citizens judge whether government is abusing its power when making use of eminent domain. Debbie Becher argues that neither a belief in property rights nor a desire for growth guide popular evaluations of government legitimacy. Instead, community residents, businesses, government bureaucrats, and politicians all appeal to a shared notion of investment to justify policy.

How to respond to the problems posed by derelict lots and vacant buildings is a question with which almost every city government grapples. Becher's analysis cuts through the familiar ideological slogans about government and private property to provide a deeper understanding of the political, economic and social forces driving urban redevelopment efforts. The result is a challenging and unexpectedly hopeful story with lessons that extend well beyond Philadelphia.

Autorentext
Debbie Becher is Assistant Professor of Sociology at Barnard College, Columbia University.

Klappentext

News media reports on eminent domain often highlight outrage and heated protest. But these accounts, Debbie Becher finds, obscure a much more complex reality of how Americans understand property. Private Property and Public Power presents the first comprehensive study of a city's acquisitions, exploring how and why Philadelphia took properties between 1992 and 2007 for private redevelopment. Becher uses original data-collected from city offices and interviews with over a hundred residents, business owners, community leaders, government representatives, attorneys, and appraisers-to explore how eminent domain really works. Surprisingly, the city took over 4,000 private properties, and these takings rarely provoked opposition. When conflicts did arise, community residents, businesses, and politicians all appealed to a shared notion of investment to justify their arguments about policy. It is this social conception of property as an investment of value, committed over time, that government is responsible for protecting. Becher's findings stand in stark contrast to the views of libertarian and left-leaning activists and academics, but recognizing property as investment, she argues, may offer a solid foundation for more progressive urban policies.

Zusammenfassung
This book examines how citizens judge whether government is abusing its power when making use of eminent domain. Debbie Becher argues that neither a belief in property rights nor a desire for growth guide popular evaluations of government legitimacy. Instead, community residents, businesses, government bureaucrats, and politicians all appeal to a shared notion of investment to justify policy.

Inhalt

• Acknowledgments

• Abbreviations

• Chapter 1. Investment and Government Legitimacy

• Chapter 2. The Policy and Politics of Urban Redevelopment

• Chapter 3. Rhetoric without a Cause: Beyond Libertarian and Left Cries of Abuse

• Chapter 4. American Street I: From Badlands to Promised Lands

• Chapter 5. American Street II: From Promises to Protests

• Chapter 6. Jefferson Square I: Competing Visions of Investment Protection

• Chapter 7. Jefferson Square II: Legitimacy through Reconciled Visions

• Chapter 8. Compensating for Property by Recognizing Investments

• Chapter 9. The Politics of Property

• Bibliography

• Appendix 1

• Appendix 2

• Appendix 3

• Notes

• Index