Human Rights and the UN Universal Periodic Review Mechanism

The book argues that despite its limitations, the UPR mechanism with its inclusive, cooperative and collaborative framework, is an important human rights mechanism with the potential to evolve over time into an effective cooperative tool for monitoring human rights implementation.

The Universal Periodic Review (UPR) is a peer-review mechanism, reviewing all 193 UN Member States' protection and promotion of human rights. After ten years of the existence of the UPR mechanism, this collection examines the effectiveness of the UPR, theoretical and conceptual debates about its modus operandi, and the lessons that can be drawn across different regions/states to identify possible improvements.

The book argues that despite its limitations, the UPR mechanism with its inclusive, cooperative, and collaborative framework, is an important human rights mechanism with the potential to evolve over time into an effective cooperative tool for monitoring human rights implementation. Divided into three parts, the first part focuses on exploring a variety of theoretical approaches to understanding the UPR mechanism. The second part examines specific human rights themes and the relationship between the UPR mechanism and other international mechanisms. Finally, the third part questions implementation and the ways in which states/regional groupings have engaged with the UPR mechanism and what lessons can be learned for the future.

The volume will be a valuable resource for researchers, academics, and policymakers working in the area of international human rights law, international organizations, and international relations. We would like to acknowledge the UPR Academic Network (UPRAN) for bringing together the experts on this project and the University of Stirling for providing funds to facilitate open access dissemination for parts of this output.

The Introduction and Chapter 6 of this book are freely available as a downloadable Open Access PDF at http://www.taylorfrancis.com under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.

Autorentext

Damian Etone is Senior Lecturer in International Human Rights Law at the University of Stirling. He is Director for the MSc Programme in Human Rights and Diplomacy run in partnership with the United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR).

Amna Nazir is Reader in International Human Rights Law and Associate Director of the Centre for Human Rights at Birmingham City University. She also serves as a trustee for the United Nations Association UK.

Alice Storey is Senior Lecturer in Law and Associate Director of the Centre for Human Rights at Birmingham City University, where she also leads the UPR Project at BCU.

Inhalt

Introduction

DAMIAN ETONE, AMNA NAZIR, AND ALICE STOREY

PART I: Theoretical and Conceptual Approaches to Understanding the UPR Mechanism

1 The Universal Periodic Review as an Evolving Process: Examining the Path of Development

KATHRYN MCNEILLY

2 The Universal Periodic Review as Utopia

AMNA NAZIR, ALICE STOREY, AND JON YORKE

3 What Is the UPR? Thinking About the UPR as a Source of International Law

FREDERICK COWELL

4 Putting Down Roots: Analysis of UPR Recommendations in the First Three Cycles

EDWARD R. MCMAHON AND TOMEK BOTWICZ

PART II: The Relationship Between the UPR and Other Human Rights Mechanisms

5 Searching for Recommendation Alignment Across UN Human Rights Bodies

ELVIRA DOMINGUEZ-REDONDO AND RHONA SMITH

6 The Universal Periodic Review and Transitional Justice

DAMIAN ETONE

7 Universal Periodic Review Prospects for Promoting Support for the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas (UNDROP)

LOUISA ASHLEY

PART III: Assessing State and Regional Engagement With the UPR Mechanism

8 Still a 'Mutual Praise Society'? The African Group at the Universal Periodic Review

EDUARD JORDAAN

9 The Significance of the UPR in the Absence of a Regional Human Rights System: The Case of the Asia Pacific

FIONA MCGAUGHEY, AMY MAGUIRE, NATALIE BAIRD, JAMES GOMEZ, AND ROMULO NAYACALEVU

10 Unpacking the Enigma of Reporting Under the Universal Periodic Review: The Case of Three Southeast Asian Countries

KAZUO FUKUDA

11 Navigating Devolution at the UPR: The Case of the United Kingdom

MICHAEL LANE