

Beschreibung
A step-by-step guide to the most efficient and effective method for participatory group decision-making Are you frustrated by that common challenge called group decision-making? Consensus-Oriented Decision-Making can help! Clearly written and well organized, ...A step-by-step guide to the most efficient and effective method for participatory group decision-making
Are you frustrated by that common challenge called group decision-making? Consensus-Oriented Decision-Making can help! Clearly written and well organized, keep this book by your side and refer to it often. Groups you are part of will function better as a result.
-- Peggy Holman, author, Engaging Emergence: Turning Upheaval into Opportunity
For any group or organization to function effectively, it must be able to make decisions well. Consensus-Oriented Decision-Making is the first book to offer groups (and group facilitators) a clear and efficient path to generating widespread agreement while fostering full participation and true collaboration.
Poised to become the new standard for group facilitation, Consensus-Oriented Decision-Making combines:
Powerful communication skills Groups using this simple, step-by-step approach experience increased cohesion and commitment and stronger relationships as a result of their successful cooperation.
Incorporating the principles of collaboration, inclusion, empathy, and open-mindedness, the consensus-oriented decision-making (CODM) process encourages shared ownership of group decisions. The method can be used in any group situation, regardless of whether the final decision-making power rests with a single person or team, a vote of members, or unanimity.
Business, government, nonprofit, social, and community organizations can all benefit from Consensus-Oriented Decision-Making . Whether you are a designated facilitator or an active participant, understanding this powerful framework will help you contribute to the success of your group through achieving maximum participation and efficiency, a clearer decision-making process, better decisions, and improved group dynamics.
Tim Hartnett, PhD, is a group facilitator and mediator who blends extensive knowledge of non-violent communication with insightful understanding of group dynamics and effective techniques for conflict resolution.
Autorentext
Tim Hartnett, Ph.D. is a group facilitator, mediator, and family therapist. Tim earned a PhD in psychology studying high conflict families in divorce. He taught group process at John F. Kennedy graduate school. He has combined best practices from the fields of professional facilitation, conflict resolution, and non-violent communication to develop CODM, a model that can help any group find the widespread agreement they need to work together well.
Inhalt
Acknowledgments
Introduction
Consensus and Unanimity
Participatory Decision-Making
Efficient Decision-Making Summary
Group Leadership
General Qualities of Effective Facilitators
The Facilitator's Primary Responsibilities
Person-in-Charge/Executive Committee
Majority Rule
Supermajority Rule
Unanimity
What Will Work Best for Your Group?
An Outline of the Steps
Step 1: Frame the Topic
Step 2: Open Discussion
Step 3: Identify Underlying Concerns
Step 4: Collaborative Proposal Development
Step 5: Choose a Direction
Step 6: Synthesize a Final Proposal
Step 7: Closure
Modifying CODM
CODM Shortcuts
Spontaneous Resolution
Summary
Collect Agenda Items
Clarify the Issue
Interview a Sample of Group Members
Identify and Delegate Pre-Meeting Research
Introduce the Discussion
Inspire an Open-Minded, Creative Discussion
Provide Guidelines and Structure for the Discussion
Manage the Discussion
Support Full and Varied Participation
Record Ideas
Summary
Identify Stakeholders
Identify Underlying Concerns
Gather All the Concerns
Summary
Describe the Collaborative Process
Select Root Ideas to Develop
Develop the Options
Facilitate Option Development
Check for Readiness to Choose a Direction
Analyze the Proposal Options
Preference Gradient Voting
Review Any Unsatisfied Concerns
Identify Details That Might Improve the Proposal
Select Which Details to Include in the Proposal
Compose Final Wording for the Proposal and a Process for Deciding Unresolved Details
Improvising the Steps to a Final Proposal
Apply the Group's Final Decision Rule
Provide Empathy for Any Unsatisfied Participants
Ratify Acceptance of the Group Decision
Request Cooperation in Implementing the Decision
Dealing with Unsatisfied Group Members
Concluding the Seven Steps
Conditions That Favor Unanimity
Process Tools to Reach Unanimity
Issues Arising from Consensus Blocking and Required Unanimity
When Should a Group Require Unanimity?
Summary
Resources for Facilitators
Appendix: CODM Crib Sheet
Notes
Index
About the Author
