Debating Libertarianism offers readers a sustained debate between two leading political philosophers over which vision of society--Rawlsian left-liberalism or libertarianism--is best and most just. In this crucial and timely book, Samuel Freeman and Jason Brennan consider both fundamental questions of justice and issues of applied policy. Along the way, they debate which economic rights people have; whether democracy liberates people and is essential for social equality, or is merely a tool to promote justice; the justification and extent of property rights and of taxation; whether the fact that freedom permits people to make bad choices is a reason to limit freedom; and whether the modern welfare state is necessary for social justice or instead a barrier to it. Debating Libertarianism offers readers both a succinct defence and critique of two important conceptions of what makes institutions just and good.

Autorentext

Jason Brennan is the Robert J. and Elizabeth Flanagan Family Professor of strategy, economics, ethics, and public policy at the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown University. He is the author of seventeen books, including Cracks in the Ivory Tower (2019), When All Else Fails (2018), In Defense of Openness (2018), and Against Democracy (2016). Samuel Freeman is the Avalon Professor Emeritus in the Humanities and Professor of Philosophy at the University of Pennsylvania. He is the author of Liberalism and Distributive Justice (2018), Justice and the Social Contract (2007), and Rawls (2007). He edited The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (2003), Rawls's Lectures in the History of Political Philosophy (2008), and John Rawls's Collected Papers (1999). He is the editor of the Oxford Political Philosophy Series and a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.