The author examines the United States and European Union's use of anti-dumping laws to demonstrate that discriminatory treatment persists even a decade after the end of the Cold War. She argues that lingering Cold War beliefs about the trade threat posed by Communist countries continue to affect the method of implementing these trade remedy laws.

Autorentext
CYNTHIA M. HORNE is an Assistant Professor at Seton Hall University's School of Diplomacy and International Relations, USA.

Inhalt
Introduction: Transitions and Trade A Logic of Belief Stasis and Belief Change Crawfish, Sparklers, and Rebar: Testing Theories of Trade Protection The Nuts and Bolts of Anti-dumping Laws: Actors and Institutions in the United States and the European Union The Institutionalization of Beliefs Rule Change but Outcome Stasis Belief Stickiness and Belief Change Integrating Non-Market Economies into the International Trading System