Synthesis and Intentional Objectivity

We shall be concemed in the following pages with some issues common to the systems of both Kant and Husserl. Given the structured nature of philosophical systems, however, the topics cannot be isolated from the systems in which they function, imbuing them in each case with a specific direction. An examination of the basic concept of Anschauung will indicate the difference between the two systems. To be sure, Anschauung points in both to the visual aspect of knowledge, an element inherent in the classical concept of theoria, which is related to the word horao, to see. In Kant, however, the visual aspect is not the highest component of cognition, since it is related to sensuality. Anschauung belongs to the synthesis and not the summit of knowledge. It is given before thinking, and is present in the ongoing search for relations between data. In Kant's understanding, pure reason can be related to data only through the medium of understanding. In this sense, we could say that Anschauung, being a variation of Schau, is that which can be perceived with the eyes. In Kant's system, it points to the presence of that which is given and thus to reception, whereas knowledge proper is a synthesis of reception and spontaneity .

Auteur

Nathan Rotenstreich, 1914-1993, was Professor of Philosophy at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He was the Rector of this University and the Vice President of the Israel Academy of Science and Humanities.
Some of his well known essays are: Between Past and Present, Spirit and Man, Tradition and Reality, and Jewish Philosophy in Modern Times. Together with S.H. Bergman he translated Kant's three Critiques into Hebrew.

Texte du rabat

This book considers some issues common to the philosophical systems of Kant and Husserl. br/ The distinction between Kant's Synthesis and Husserl's Intentionality is the main subject of this book. br/ The theme of the analysis is the variation of the position and essence of the term emIntuition - Anschauung/em in the two systems. In both systems, emIntuition/em has a central significance. In Kant's system it is because of his conception that the structure of knowledge is a synthesis of intuition and reason. In Husserl's system this is because he considered emIntuition/em to be the medium for the discernment of data. br/ Given the structured nature of philosophical systems, these topics cannot be isolated from the systems in which they function, relating them in each case with various paths of investigation and different interpretations of phenomenology.

Contenu
I: Sensuality and Ideation.- II: Conditions and Foundations.- III: From Ideation to Constitution.- IV: Fundamental Data and Their Exposition.- V: From Exposition to Phenomenological Insight.- VI: The Beginning and the Goal.- VII: Science and Philosophy.- Postscript.