Oversight

Zusatztext "Wow! what a smart book! Minta expands our understanding of effective minority representation in an area of the policy process overlooked by scholars and pundits alike-implementation-where vigilance is rewarded and disinterest catastrophic. This is an important work." -Gary Segura! Stanford University Informationen zum Autor Michael D. Minta is assistant professor of African and African American studies and political science at Washington University in St. Louis. Klappentext Oversight answers the question of whether black and Latino legislators better represent minority interests in Congress than white legislators, and it is the first book on the subject to focus on congressional oversight rather than roll-call voting. In this important book, Michael Minta demonstrates that minority lawmakers provide qualitatively better representation of black and Latino interests than their white counterparts. They are more likely to intervene in decision making by federal agencies by testifying in support of minority interests at congressional oversight hearings. Minority legislators write more letters urging agency officials to enforce civil rights policies, and spend significant time and effort advocating for solutions to problems that affect all racial and ethnic groups, such as poverty, inadequate health care, fair housing, and community development. In Oversight, Minta argues that minority members of Congress act on behalf of broad minority interests--inside and outside their districts--because of a shared bond of experience and a sense of linked fate. He shows how the presence of black and Latino legislators in the committee room increases the chances that minority perspectives and concerns will be addressed in committee deliberations, and also how minority lawmakers are effective at countering negative stereotypes about minorities in policy debates on issues like affirmative action and affordable housing. Zusammenfassung Oversight answers the question of whether black and Latino legislators better represent minority interests in Congress than white legislators, and it is the first book on the subject to focus on congressional oversight rather than roll-call voting. In this important book, Michael Minta demonstrates that minority lawmakers provide qualitatively better representation of black and Latino interests than their white counterparts. They are more likely to intervene in decision making by federal agencies by testifying in support of minority interests at congressional oversight hearings. Minority legislators write more letters urging agency officials to enforce civil rights policies, and spend significant time and effort advocating for solutions to problems that affect all racial and ethnic groups, such as poverty, inadequate health care, fair housing, and community development. In Oversight , Minta argues that minority members of Congress act on behalf of broad minority interests--inside and outside their districts--because of a shared bond of experience and a sense of linked fate. He shows how the presence of black and Latino legislators in the committee room increases the chances that minority perspectives and concerns will be addressed in committee deliberations, and also how minority lawmakers are effective at countering negative stereotypes about minorities in policy debates on issues like affirmative action and affordable housing. Inhaltsverzeichnis List of Figures and Tables ix Acknowledgments xi Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Voting as a Measure of Representation 5 Oversight as a Form of Political Representation 10 Strategic Group Uplift 12 Chapter Outline 14 Chapter 2: Race! Ethnicity! and a Theory of Substantive Representation in Congressional Oversight 16 Origins and Presence of Strategic Group Uplift in African Americans 18 Origins of Strategic Group Uplift for Latino Legislators ...

Auteur

Michael D. Minta is assistant professor of African and African American studies and political science at Washington University in St. Louis.

Texte du rabat

Oversight answers the question of whether black and Latino legislators better represent minority interests in Congress than white legislators, and it is the first book on the subject to focus on congressional oversight rather than roll-call voting. In this important book, Michael Minta demonstrates that minority lawmakers provide qualitatively better representation of black and Latino interests than their white counterparts. They are more likely to intervene in decision making by federal agencies by testifying in support of minority interests at congressional oversight hearings. Minority legislators write more letters urging agency officials to enforce civil rights policies, and spend significant time and effort advocating for solutions to problems that affect all racial and ethnic groups, such as poverty, inadequate health care, fair housing, and community development. In Oversight, Minta argues that minority members of Congress act on behalf of broad minority interests--inside and outside their districts--because of a shared bond of experience and a sense of linked fate. He shows how the presence of black and Latino legislators in the committee room increases the chances that minority perspectives and concerns will be addressed in committee deliberations, and also how minority lawmakers are effective at countering negative stereotypes about minorities in policy debates on issues like affirmative action and affordable housing.

Contenu

List of Figures and Tables ix Acknowledgments xi Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Voting as a Measure of Representation 5 Oversight as a Form of Political Representation 10 Strategic Group Uplift 12 Chapter Outline 14 Chapter 2: Race, Ethnicity, and a Theory of Substantive Representation in Congressional Oversight 16 Origins and Presence of Strategic Group Uplift in African Americans 18 Origins of Strategic Group Uplift for Latino Legislators 23 Hypotheses and Alternative Explanations 26 Conclusion 33 Chapter 3: Congress, Minority Interests, and Federal Policymaking 35 Congressional Intervention and African Americans 37 Mexican Americans and the Federal Government 45 Puerto Ricans and the Federal Government 46 Cuban Americans and Federal Government Intervention 47 Federal Interventions and Latino Interests 48 Federal Attention to Racial and Social Welfare Policies 50 Conclusion 52 Chapter 4: Black and Brown Voices in Committee Deliberations on Civil Rights 54 Measuring Advocacy of Minority Interests in Committees 56 Racial and Ethnic Diversity of Congressional Overseers and Legislative Responsiveness 60 Civil Rights Enforcement in the Clinton Years 63 Return to Republican Rule and the Fight for Minority Rights 66 Civil Rights Enforcement in the Post-9/11 Era 76 Beyond the Deliberations 80 Conclusion 82 Chapter 5: Congressional Oversight and Social Welfare Policy 84 Racial and Ethnic Diversity of Congressional Overseers 85 Congressional Attention to Social Welfare Issues and Legislative Responsiveness 88 Liberal Social Welfare Policy and the Clinton Years 90 Diversity of Perspectives and Challenging Negative Stereotypes in Social Welfare Debates 94 The Republicans' Contract with America and Retrenchment of Social Welfare Policies 97 Diversity of Perspectives in Deliberations 104 Social Welfare Policy in the Post-9/11 Era 106 Conclusion 111 Chapter 6: Conclusion 113 Implications for Racial, Ethnic, and Class-Based Politics 115 Implications for Coalition Politics 117 Implications for Political Representation 118 Legislative Responsiveness and Democratic Accountability 119 Legislators' Motivations and Strategic Group Uplift 120 Congressional and Bureaucratic Relations 121 Limitations of Strategic Group Uplift 122 Public Policy Implications 123 APPENDIX A Data and Methodology 127 APPENDIX B Coding Protocol for Congressional Hearings 132 APPENDIX C Racial/Ethnic Congressional Hearings Coded 134 APPENDIX D General Social Welfar…