Revealing the Mysterion

In the last several decades, scholars largely agree that the NT term mysterion is a terminus technicus, originating from Daniel. Mystery constitutes a revelation of God's hidden eschatological wisdom. This project traces the word in the Dead Sea Scrolls and other sectors of Judaism. Like Daniel, the term consistently retains eschatological connotations. The monograph then examines how mystery functions within 1 Corinthians and seeks to explain why the term is often employed. Throughout the letter, Paul alludes to Daniel, especially in conjunction with the notion of mystery. Of particular interest is the polemical nature of the term in 1 Cor 1-2 that may reflect its narratival use in Daniel God's wisdom is superior to the wisdom of the wise Babylonians. Paul's overall concern of unity within the Corinthian community is central to the rhetorical effect of the epistle. The divided Corinthian community must rally around mystery of the cross the Messiah reigning in the midst of defeat. In addition, the Apostle is a steward of mysteries (4:1), a claim that may reflect a conscious effort to align himself with the character Daniel. Other uses of the apocalyptic term concern eschatological revelations and tongues, charismatic exegesis, and the transformation of believers into the image of the last Adam.

Auteur

Benjamin L. Gladd, Wheaton College, Wheaton, Illinois, USA.

Texte du rabat
Scholars largely agree that the NT term ?mysterion? is a terminus technicus, originating from Daniel. This project traces the word in the Dead Sea Scrolls and other sectors of Judaism. Like Daniel, the term consistently retains eschatological connotations. The monograph then examines how mystery functions within 1 Corinthians and seeks to explain why the term is often employed. The apocalyptic term concerns the Messiah reigning in the midst of defeat, eschatological revelations and tongues, charismatic exegesis, and the transformation of believers into the image of the last Adam.

Résumé

"The book is a good example of the continued usefulness of intertextuality and will be a fine addition to any theological library."
John K. Goodrich in: Religious Studies Review 1/2010