Investing in Repression?

This book represents an important contribution to
the debate on the impact of foreign direct
investment on human rights in the Global South.
Political scientist, Amir Azarvan, assesses both
quantitatively and qualitatively - the effects of
FDI on socioeconomic well-being and physical
integrity rights in host countries.

Statistical analysis largely disconfirms the
neoliberal theory that FDI reduces the repression of
physical integrity rights over time. In contrast,
there is stronger evidence for the historical
structuralist theory that countries with large flows
of FDI are more repressive in times of domestic
unrest. Case study analysis largely supports these
statistical findings and, in the case of Algeria,
suggests ways to modify historical structuralism.

These findings thus constitute a challenge to what
appears to be an emerging neoliberal consensus in
the literature,and imply the need to more closely
regulate the activities of multinational
corporations.

Autorentext

Amir Azarvan, Ph.D., is on the faculty of the Department of Political Science and International Affairs at Kennesaw State University.

Klappentext

This book represents an important contribution to the debate on the impact of foreign direct investment on human rights in the Global South. Political scientist, Amir Azarvan, assesses - both quantitatively and qualitatively - the effects of FDI on socioeconomic well-being and physical integrity rights in host countries. Statistical analysis largely disconfirms the neoliberal theory that FDI reduces the repression of physical integrity rights over time. In contrast, there is stronger evidence for the historical structuralist theory that countries with large flows of FDI are more repressive in times of domestic unrest. Case study analysis largely supports these statistical findings and, in the case of Algeria, suggests ways to modify historical structuralism.These findings thus constitute a challenge to what appears to be an emerging neoliberal consensus in the literature,and imply the need to more closely regulate the activities of multinational corporations.